View Poll Results: Which is your favourite of the Big 4 leagues?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • National Basketball Association

    4 28.57%
  • National Football League

    3 21.43%
  • National Hockey League

    3 21.43%
  • Major League Baseball

    4 28.57%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 46 of 46
  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    442
    I'm surpried we have 13 people who voted lol.

  2. #42
    Senior Member LWO4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    310
    14, basketball and baseball are tied.

  3. #43
    Super Moderator Prime Time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,305
    Quote Originally Posted by LK3185 View Post
    It doesn't matter Powder's feelings on the game today when if i'm assuming correctly, that's not why Prime doesn't 'get' basketball. I don't understand that myself. Every sport has certain goals and rules attached. Basketball you put the ball in the hole or defend from teams doing that lol.
    I'm going to assume that you're not just being deliberately glib, and I'll try and explain then. I like sports that appear to have a certain logic to them, and the way that you play them not just to the ends of scoring. Any idiot can watch soccer and think 'oh you just kick a ball into the net' but the thing that makes it interesting to me is do you play short or direct, do you line with up a three, four, or five man midfield/defence, who wins the individual battles between centre half and centre forward, do you try and play it out from the back, etc. In the NFL the obvious distinction is whether you move the ball primarily on the ground or through the air, and what the opposition does to counter that, but of course there's much more to it than that. In Rugby there's a simple opposition between trying to play for possession and move the ball yourself or to try and play for territory and press the opposition into giving you the ball in advantageous positions, as well as choices between the pick and go, kicking the ball into space or touch, and throwing the ball around.

    It boils down to this - there's a tactical level there in each of those games that, beyond the rules, makes something into an interesting spectator sport rather than just a fun game that you'd play to stay in shape (which unlike pretty much all the others sports we've talked about here is Basketball's origin). Without that extra level I would see no appeal in watching sport, and there'd only be any enjoyment in playing it.

    I am sure that Basketball has that and am looking forward to trying to get to grips with what's in LWO4Life's post above, but I have never been able to see any of it for myself. It has always looked to me like no more than a group of guys throwing the ball around in a pretty random fashion until someone shoots and either scores or misses - and that the misses are paradoxically more important than the baskets.

    Now I know that has to be wrong or it wouldn't be as popular as it is. Before anyone tries to come back at me for that, let me repeat, I know there must be more to the game. But I also know that I've never been able to get what that 'more' is.

    So yeah, that should be clearer.




    I for one am glad to see all the leagues getting votes. It's a good one not to have a runaway winner on.
    Last edited by Prime Time; 2 Hours Ago at 07:15 AM.

    "The worst moron is the one too stupid to realise they're a moron."

  4. #44
    Feeling Minnesota Powder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    330
    Prime, if you want to "get basketball", and I am not speaking in hyperbole but go and watch any of the Lakers vs Celtics finals from the 1980s. Every game in any of the series show the true sport of basketball, before it was completely corrupted by the "I must show off and try to be come the next Michael Jordan to get on SportsCenter" player.

    Every player on both teams understood how to play, pass, use each other and play a complete team game. Within 10-12 years, the game moved into a me first, selfish game where players are truly only concerned with image, getting on highlight reels, and sneaker deals. There is a reason that of the 24 Lakers/Celtics of the 80s, that about 12-15 Hall of Famers.

  5. #45
    Senior Member LWO4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    310


    Well anyways, if you are interested, here is a video of the Princeton Offense. Many of the offenses today are based in the Princeton offense. It's very pass heavy, so the whole, "they just pass the ball," is explained here.

  6. #46
    Super Moderator Prime Time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,305
    Oh yeah, I am interested and this is helping. I could probably still do with it being dumbed down a touch to be honest (especially as I'm not really up on a lot of the terminology), but yeah, I think I'm getting a bit more. The bit on the previous page about Jordan is the sort of thing I was driving at in my last post, for sure.

    Thanks to Powder too for his recommendation, because one of the things that really drew me into baseball was that the history of it, and while it obviously isn't going to go back into the nineteenth century and be quite as illustrious as baseball's I think the fact that I don't really know any of it, or what the major rivalries are, what makes a game more or less significant over time, doesn't help. That kind of thing can really draw you in but I think the only thing I really know other than a handful of names are that the 1990s Bulls were awesome, and that's it. So getting to grips with a famous game isn't the worst idea in the world to try and get past that.

    "The worst moron is the one too stupid to realise they're a moron."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •