Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 201 to 226 of 226
  1. #201
    The Brain
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    2,506
    That's a wealth of good news! The outpouring of wrestler's praising AEW for signing Lynn to that role has been overwhelming, so clearly he's a good choice. Bryce and Knox are two of the best referees ever, I just hope they still are available for the respective home promotions of CHIKARA and PWG. Bringing on Angelico and especially Jack Evans is great, Evans is one of my favorite picks so far and I think he'll rock it out with this roster.

  2. #202
    Did not know about Evans...man, he's great! Would love to see him mix it up with Jericho as friend or foe.
    Last edited by Benjamin Button; 1 Week Ago at 02:56 AM.

  3. #203
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    890
    Evans is one of those guys who I never really got into until Lucha Underground, and then got super into. Glad to see he's coming in. Weren't he and Angelica tag partners in AAA?

  4. #204
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    997
    Yes and it looks from Angelico video that he and Jack Evans are coming in together

  5. #205
    The Brain
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    2,506
    Yup, they were closely aligned for quite a while actually, to the point that they still wore their matching gear in LU despite not partnering up. Agreed on LU showcasing a new side of Evans, at least to me. I always liked the guy but he seemed like he was all spots and not much character until then, but the whole "I invented lucha libre" shtick killed me and he had personality spare once he decided to actually show it off.

  6. #206
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    They were three time AAA Tag Team Champions in AAA and probably would've been the key team in the division for years if AAA hadn't fired Jack for, and this is true, publicly criticizing the fake La Parka (Jack has since returned to AAA on a freelance basis). Once that happened Angelico, who had already moved to Spain, stopped appearing as much and eventually just left to work Europe. And now here we are.

    Jack is tremendous and has always had this personality. The problem is he's so unbelievably gifted at the high flying stuff that it's hard to book him as a heel (which is a more natural role for him based off his ultra confident personality), which is why he was generally a face during his indie days. When he went to AAA with Teddy Hart Konnan positioned them as a rudo tag team and they thrived for awhile until Jack had to turn because, once again, his move set was so spectacular that he got over and they had no choice (Teddy meanwhile managed to master being a rudo, mostly because he was a major asshole in real life at the time, while also keeping his high flying style). LU was really the first place that booked Jack as a rudo and not only decided to stick with it but reinforced it by doubling down on Jack's persona; that ended up being the key to him standing out more. He's kept that same persona everywhere he's went since, most notably PWG where, back in 2015, he and Angelico had a killer match with the Bucks. The Bucks from time to time have raved about how much they loved that match, so that (and the fact WWE won't touch Jack because Jack loves his weed) was pretty much what led to this.


  7. #207

  8. #208
    The Brain
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    2,506
    Really, really pleased it's confirmed so hopefully it can stop being a point of conversation! Looking forward to checking out the show when it airs.

  9. #209
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    The only thing up for debate at this point is how much money AEW is getting in the deal. There was one reporter earlier (I believe he works for TSN in Canada) that said that while AEW won't be getting rights fees, TNT will be covering production and the two sides will be splitting the ad revenue in a favorable way towards AEW. It would basically be a case where AEW would earn money via that, PPV buys (more on that in a moment) and attendance; aka the old fashioned way promotions used to make money before WWE changed the game with TV right fees and the WWE Network. This report has since been slightly disputed by a few people to suggest AEW is being paid rights fees, so it's not conclusive either way.

    Really, it doesn't matter. What does is that AEW will be on TNT, they will be shown in Prime Time AND they're making at least decent money off this. It's a terrific deal overall, even if it doesn't turn out to be anywhere near WWE numbers (it was never going to be). Now it comes down to them showing everyone what they can do. There will still be some controversy going into Double or Nothing as the show is being priced at $49.99 on WarnerMedia's B/R Live streaming service, $49.99 on several other PPV outlets (like Verizon Fios) and $59.99 on other PPV outlets like Comcast. That appears to be very steep and I'd normally agree. As it turns out though All In was priced at $40 on FITE and up to $45 on at least a few PPV outlets, meaning (unless you really just want to give $60 to AEW via Comcast or whoever) you'll really just be paying about $5 to $10 more than you did All In. It's still more than I would've done, but it's not as outrageous as some where claiming it to be in the never ending battle between people who think AEW is the greatest and WWE is the devil and people who think WWE is the greatest and AEW is the devil.


  10. #210
    Super Moderator Team Farrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    392
    So, it's nice to see them with a big time TV deal (I wonder how Bischoff really feels) I hope that they can draw an audience.

    However, I think that Double or Nothing is entirely overpriced. WWE had set the industry standard at a PPV being worth $10. I think that FITE somewhat has changed that. I spend $24.99 on the Crockett Cup a few weeks ago. That's my personal upper limit of what I'll spend on a PPV in 2019, and I'll be interested to see if we ever get any numbers on how this one does.

    I hope that it does well, but I likely won't be shelling out $50 for the thing. I can't imagine paying that kind of money for a PPV, and I seem to recall that after WWE made the transition to HD and bumped all of their PPV events to that price range, their buys tanked. Say what you will about quality or whatever you'd like being a contributing factor, it is possible to price yourself out of the market, regardless of your quality and how much people might want to watch.

    I hope that it does well, but with the level of negative feedback I've seen on that pricepoint, I think this might be a highly pirated show.

    EDIT: Also, I can't find it on FITE. Is that because I'm in Canada, or is it no up for purchase yet?

  11. #211
    Cero Miedo Mystic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    323
    You'd need to get it through B/R Live. I'm not sure it's up there yet, but they've confirmed that price and that's where it will be officially, as they are part of the Warner/Turner group.. I'm guessing B/R Live cancels out Fite.

    My hope is that, in time, they will offer something like league pass for AEW on B/R Live, where you get all the additional footage and PPV. The current model doesn't seem sustainable, and I'm hoping it's only until they put together enough weekly content to do some sort of pass or the like through B/R Live.

    I'm going to pay the 49.99, reluctantly, but I won't do this forever, especially if they have lots of PPVs. I would maybe do it 4 times a year or something.

  12. #212
    I don't think a mass pirating of the event is going to hurt them in the long run anyway, if it were to happen. This show is all about an introduction to the brand. I'm sure they'll take the loss over the exposure.

  13. #213
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    890
    I think in the UK it's only something like 15 (about $18, I think?) to get it on ITV Box Office or whatever it's called. That's not too bad - the Network is a tenner a month.

  14. #214
    Administrator Prime Time's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    3,173
    Worth pointing out that our attitude to PPV in the UK is so different that if they tried to charge that here, literally no one would buy it. WWE were still giving away a lot of their PPVs for free in the UK until 2005, don't forget, and it hurt their popularity here when they stopped quite significantly.

    "The worst moron is the one too stupid to realise they're a moron."

  15. #215
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    997
    The All In show was $45 on PPV, I got it because i wanted to support the guys and i liked the card. This is a whole different deal though with being a start up company. They sort of have to g by the PPV model to make any type of money and pricing it at $50 for most that's steep but alternative is likely running more shows at a lesser price.

    I think depending on the number of buys they get, they will adjust. Also i can't see them doing monthly PPVs. Isn't the next show in July?

  16. #216
    Super Moderator Team Farrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    392
    I'm pretty sure the Fyter or whatever that stupid pun is for the next one is late June. And then again in July, and then likely All In II in September. It's shaping up like a monthly PPV schedule.

    I dunno. Like I said, I think that the price point for the NWA show was perfect. They didn't have as high a talent budget or as much of a need to draw big money as AEW does, but with all of the streaming services that are already out there and people are paying for (NJPW World, Honor Club, WWE Network, ect.), plus FITE starting to catch on and pretty regularly having some strong content (but at a price per show), something is going to have to give whether it be the price point or shows beginning to see fewer buys. That could start to edge niche things like GCW right out of the online streaming market.

    Once or twice a year for a major spectacle show you can probably get away with $50 for a show. Monthly and it's going to be diminishing returns.

  17. #217
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    I would be STUNNED if either Fyter Fest or Fight for the Fallen were priced like this. Remember that Omega pretty much did Fyter Fest last year under the New Japan umbrella, and that show was merely streamed on Twitch. I'd expect the same this time around. Meanwhile Fight for the Fallen is a tribute show where they're not planning on making a profit (all proceeds go to victims of gun violence) filmed in a place that barely sits 7K. I could be wrong but at worst I expect they'll be on B/R for a small price and more than likely will be for free either on Twitch or AEW's social media platforms. The next real big show will be Labor Day weekend in Chicago; whether that has this price or not depends on how well this one does.

    The thing that hasn't really gotten around is that AEW didn't have a lot of control over this, something you'll notice if you look at how certain providers are pricing it. Some places like Comcast are asking for $60, others are asking for $50 (same as B/R). If AEW had full control over this it would likely be one price across the board, maybe a little less for streaming; the fact that it's all over the place tells you this was less them setting the price and more the providers because they think this show is going to be a hit. They may be right; it's forgotten that All In, in addition to being a good show, was wildly successful and as Lazyking pointed out that was with prices ranging up to just $5 less than most providers are charging for Double or Nothing. Everyone is trying to maximize profits, so if All In did well at the $40-$45 range, it's not unreasonable to think they can do close to, if not just as well, at the $50 range and make more money. I guarantee that's what the providers are thinking; whether it works or not remains to be seen but that's why. If it doesn't work, they can always change it.

    And frankly I can't blame them and in many ways think this reaction to the price is vastly overblown. It be one thing if All In was priced between $25 to $30 and then hiked this high, or if everyone was asking the price Comcast is. But that's not the case. The reality is that the providers, and AEW by extension, are really just asking for $5 to $10 more than they did for All In; I get it if you don't want to spend that much because the card doesn't interest you, but if you are interested and paid the $40 to $45 for All In, was is it suddenly a big deal to spend $5 to $10 more?


  18. #218
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    890
    TNT have a streaming service though, right? Any chance of that being used for these in the future, and you buy access to an AEW Network?

  19. #219
    Transgender Terror
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    103
    Only if it's $9.99.

  20. #220
    Super Moderator Team Farrell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by Cult Icon View Post
    I get it if you don't want to spend that much because the card doesn't interest you, but if you are interested and paid the $40 to $45 for All In, was is it suddenly a big deal to spend $5 to $10 more?
    To me, yes it is. It's not that I don't have it. It's not that I'm cheap. It's that I'm already paying for The Network, I'm paying for NJPW World, I just bought Crockett Cup less than a month before Double or Nothing...at some point the amount I'm willing to spend on pro wrestling has to hit a ceiling.

    I'll be running events that weekend anyway, but I had given some though to inviting the boys back to my place to watch it was sort of an after party. I'm not sure I'd bother at that price point.

    NOTE: I literally just fired up FITE. Double or Nothing is finally listed...at $34.99. Perhaps the folks at AEW heard the outcry?

  21. #221
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    It's still $49.99 on B/R and I'd assume most of the other PPV providers so no. But this makes sense because, once more (you open the door!), it is the PPV providers coming up with this price, not AEW! I cannot stress this enough. AEW may have slight input, they may not be against the price (I honestly don't know) but at the end of the day the individual provider, be it FITE, Comcast, Fios, Cox, B/R, whoever, makes the call. That's why you see so many different prices between them all. If it were AEW coming up with them, I'd reckon they'd all be the same or at least in the same ballpark.

    Also, Double or Nothing isn't available on FITE in the US and UK because of the PPV deals in those markets. It's only available outside in places like Canada, Australia and so on. That's probably a factor too in why the price is lower, possibly the exchange rates too.


  22. #222
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    This hasn't been posted here yet so I'll do it along with additional details as we currently have them. Unfortunately the Hangman Page vs. Pac match is off for Double or Nothing. To make up for it Page flew to England to do a fifteen minute match with Pac that ended in a draw; it'll be shown this week on one of AEW's social media channels. Once again though, the match will not take place at Double or Nothing.

    Now why isn't it? It originally appeared to be a case of Dragon Gate requesting Pac not lose to Hangman because of his reign as DG's top champion, but recent information suggests that Pac was actually supposed to beat Hangman. The issue instead was a potential Pac-Omega match down the road in Chicago Labor Day weekend. AEW's plan appears to have been that both Pac and Omega would win next weekend then build towards a match in Chicago were the first ever AEW Champion would be crowned (the Pac & Lucha Brothers vs. Omega & Young Bucks match at Fyter Fest supports this). The issue is Pac is or could still be Open the Dream Gate Champion for Dragon Gate at that time or and Dragon Gate, who is pushing him as undefeated right now, doesn't want him losing. Thus, to avoid conflict, AEW scrapped this idea for now and will be replacing someone with Pac in the same position. If anything else comes out I'll update this. No news on who will be the replacement, though AEW is looking for a big name.


  23. #223
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    890
    Shame, as PAC vs Omega certainly sounds like it could be killer. Understandable that DG want to protect themselves and their storyline work, though. Could AEW not have had PAC beat Page and then left open the options for the later show, in case PAC drops the title? And if he doesn't they could have worked something else out?

  24. #224
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    In theory they could've done anything they wanted. But at this point they have a long term plan in place and didn't want to mess with it. They also don't want there to be any draws or screwy finishes for most (if not all) of the matches this weekend, both because they don't have time to do a long draw and because they want all clean finishes to start off. So Pac vs. Page had to end clean on this show (whereas in the match they did in the UK they could do a draw) and AEW was then left with the choice of putting over Page (which they didn't want to do), putting over Pac (we know all the pitfalls of that now) or take Pac out and replace him with someone who can both win this match and put Omega over when needs be. They seemingly chose the latter. As to who the replacement is, I guess we'll just have to wait and see; I expect it'll be kept a surprise until the show.


  25. #225
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    370
    The latest wrinkle; AEW announced today on the final Road to Double or Nothing episode that the winner of Omega/Jericho will take on the winner of the Casino Battle Royal at a future show (likely the Labor Day weekend show in Chicago) to determine the first ever AEW World Champion. The 21 person Battle Royal as of now features;

    -Ace Romero
    -Billy Gunn
    -Brandon Cutler
    -Brian Pillman Jr.
    -Dustin Thomas (No Legs from GCW)
    -Glacier
    -Isiah Kassidy
    -Jimmy Havoc
    -Joey Janela
    -Jungle Boy
    -Luchasaurus (Vibora from Lucha Underground)
    -Marq Quen
    -Michael Nakazawa
    -MJF
    -Shawn Spears (Tye Dillinger)
    -Sonny Kiss
    -Sunny Daze

    That's seventeen names, which means four slots are left open. None of those names seem likely to be an opponent for Omega (or Jericho) come September, at least by my estimation. I would be prepared for a big surprise.


  26. #226
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    997
    Moxley or somebody not named Punk would be my best guess.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •